1.9 Executive Director Performance Appraisal Methodology
Objectives/Principles
- Evaluating the performance of the Executive Director is an important duty of the Board of Trustees, and therefore should include the active participation of all Trustees.
- Active participation in the Evaluation Process includes completion of a Performance Appraisal Form; participation in the discussion to develop a Performance Report; and, a personal interview with the Executive Director.
- The process for evaluating the performance of the Executive Director should be free of real or perceived conflicts of interest.
- The primary responsibility of the Executive Director is the effective management of the operations of IMRF. The quality of the operations constitutes an important measure of performance.
- The Evaluation Process and Performance Appraisal Form are intended to communicate clear, useful and meaningful goals and performance standards to the Executive Director in a timely manner.
- It is the intent of the Board to communicate the Performance Report by using one voice developed through consensus by following the Evaluation Process.
- Clearly stated goals and performance standards will better enable the Board of Trustees to hold the Executive Director accountable for performance.
- Evaluation criteria will be used in evaluating the Executive Director’s performance.
- Evaluation criteria should:
- Reflect the purpose and unique nature of IMRF operations.
- Pertain to operations over which the Executive Director has a reasonable degree of control.
- Be generally consistent from year to year.
- Be agreed upon by the Board of Trustees and the Executive Director.
- The Evaluation Process is continuous. Feedback will be provided the Executive Director as needed throughout the year.