Ethics Advisor and Ethics Commission

Vendor Code of Conduct
Code of Conduct

An ethics advisor for IMRF shall be designated by the Executive Director, with the advice and consent of the Board of Trustees. The ethics advisor shall provide guidance to the trustees and employees of IMRF concerning the interpretation of and compliance with the provisions of the IMRF Ethics Policy. The ethics advisor shall perform such other duties as may be delegated by the Board of Trustees.

An IMRF Ethics Commission shall be created, comprised of three members: the President of the Board of Trustees, the Vice-President, and the Chief Audit Officer. The Board Secretary shall be the conflict substitute.

The Ethics Commission shall have the following powers and duties:

  1. To promulgate procedures and rules governing the performance of its duties and the exercise of its powers.
  2. To investigate, conduct hearings and deliberations, issue recommendations for disciplinary actions regarding violations of this Ethics Policy. The Commission shall, however, act only upon the receipt of a written complaint alleging a violation of the Ethics Policy and not upon its own prerogative.
  3. To receive information from the public and from trustees and employees pertaining to its investigations and to require additional information and documents from persons who may have violated the provisions of this Policy.
  4. It is the obligation of all trustees and employees of IMRF to cooperate with the Commission during the course of its investigations. Failure or refusal to cooperate with requests by the Commission shall constitute grounds for discipline or censure.

Complaints alleging a violation of this Ethics Policy shall be filed with the Ethics Commission.

After receipt of a complaint, the Commission shall notify the respondent that a complaint has been filed against him or her and provide a copy of the complaint. The Commission shall also notify the complainant that the complaint was received. The notices to the respondent and the complainant shall also advise them of the date, time and place of the meeting to determine the sufficiency of the complaint and to establish whether probable cause exists to proceed.

The Commission shall meet to review the sufficiency of the complaint and, if the complaint is deemed sufficient to allege a violation of the Policy, to determine whether there is probable cause, based on the evidence presented by the complainant, to proceed. The Commission shall issue notice to the complainant and the respondent of the Commission’s ruling on the sufficiency of the complaint and, if necessary, on probable cause to proceed within 10 business days after receiving the complaint.

If the complaint is deemed sufficient to allege a violation of the Policy and there is a determination of probable cause, then the Commission’s notice to the parties shall include a hearing date scheduled within 45 business days after the complaint’s receipt. If the complaint is deemed not sufficient to allege a violation or if there is no determination of probable cause, then the Commission shall send a notice to the parties of the decision to dismiss the complaint.

On the scheduled date the Commission shall conduct a hearing on the complaint and shall allow both parties the opportunity to present testimony and evidence.

Within 30 days after the date the hearing or any recessed hearing is concluded, the Commission shall either (i) dismiss the complaint or (ii) issue a recommendation for discipline to the Executive Director and the Board of Trustees. A copy of the recommendation shall be given to the alleged violator.

A complaint alleging a violation of the Ethics Policy must be filed with the Ethics Commission within one year after the alleged violation.