What's new about IMRF.

Home

Members Retirees Employers Legislation Search

bullet Member Access
bullet Employer Access
bullet IMRF Forms
bullet Publications
bullet Inactive Members
bullet Frequently Asked
    Questions (FAQ)
bullet About IMRF
bullet Employer Workshops
bullet Member Workshops
bullet Retiree Seminars
bullet en español
bullet Employment at IMRF
bullet Find IMRF Employers
bullet Board of Trustees
bullet Field Services
bullet Investments
bullet Endorsed Insurance
bullet Press Room
bullet Procurement
bullet For Reciprocal Systems
bullet Connect with IMRF
RSS Feed RSS Feeds

Look Before You Leap
The Unintended Consequences of Pension Freezes

Americans are increasingly worried about their retirement security in the face of falling home values, turmoil in the financial markets, and general economic instability. This insecurity can, at least in part, be attributed to the fact that fewer workers and retirees are able to count on a secure, predictable monthly pension, as more employers in the private sector have “frozen” participation in their pension plans.

The trend away from traditional defined benefit pension plans in the private sector in favor of individual retirement savings accounts (such as those found in defined contribution plans) has left Americans especially vulnerable to the volatility in financial markets.

With the economy becoming weaker, many state and local governments will be facing fiscal challenges in the months and years ahead. These challenges will undoubtedly prompt governments to carefully examine all aspects of their budgets, including pension costs for state and local workforces.

Policymakers may be wondering, “Are secure retirement benefits for our employees still affordable?” or “Should we consider shifting to a defined contribution approach?” This brief explores important factors public employers should keep in mind when making decisions about their retirement programs.

The National Institute on Retirement Security concluded that caution should be the watchword for governments that might be tempted to follow the trend in the private sector to abandon defined benefit (DB) pensions in favor of defined contribution (DC) plans.

Key Findings

They find that freezing DB plans can have several serious, unintended consequences.

  • Freezing a DB pension and moving to a DC plan can increase costs to the employer/ taxpayer at exactly the wrong time. This is because …
    • Maintaining two plans is more costly than operating just one;
    • Forgoing and undermining the economic efficiencies of DB pensions drives up retirement plan costs; and
    • Accounting rules can require pension costs to accelerate in the wake of a freeze.
  • Freezing a DB pension and moving to a DC plan can worsen retirement insecurity, potentially damaging recruitment and retention efforts.

Because of this, most states that have studied whether to freeze a DB and switch to a DC plan have found continuation of the DB plan to be in the best interests of employers/taxpayers and employees

Download the brief here (pdf)

 


If you have questions regarding IMRF, Communicate with Us.

| Home Page | Members | Retirees | Employers | Inactive Members | Publications | Legislation | Find IMRF |
| Employment at IMRF | Board of Trustees || Field Services | About IMRF | Press Room |
| Privacy Policy and Legal Disclaimer | Search IMRF Online |


IMRF Online provides a brief summary of IMRF benefits and the adminstration of those benefits. IMRF members' and employers' rights and obligations are governed by Article 7 of the Illinois Pension Code. Statements in these publications are general, and the Illinois state law governing IMRF is complex and specific. If a conflict arises between information in these publications and the law, all decisions are based on the law.

Copyright © Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund

Page Last Updated by lbh on 02-13-09